Premartial Agreements In The UK
Go to: Previous Article Next Article
A pre-nuptial agreement is a formal written agreement, put into prior to the marriage of a couple, which places out what will occur should their marriage be result in divorce. In the UK any couple looking at marriage, or a same-sex couple thinking of a civil partnership under the Civil Partnership Act 2004 (UK), may go into a pre-nuptial agreement. An agreement which is entered into after marriage isn't a pre-nuptial agreement and yet a post-nuptial agreement.
Enforceability: Until recently it's been the position of the UK courts not to have concern to pre-nuptial agreements when analyzing divorce settlements. Rather financial orders are made with concern to the concerns laid out in section 25 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 (UK) which firstly accepts the welfare of any children from the relationship, and then a long list of variables evaluating the financial position of all parties. This has generally resulted in 50/50 rulings, leaving partners who came into a marriage with significantly more wealth than their partner financially impaired.
UK Courts have moved with this position incrementally with the case of K v K [2003] being the first time a pre-nuptial agreement was upheld. Since then the court has upheld other agreements, nevertheless they are far from automatically enforceable. The overall standing of the courts can be summarized as not letting pre-nuptial agreements to cause an unjust result to divorce proceedings, thus it is important to have concern to the following aspects when drafting. It is apparent from cases including Crossley v Crossley that courts can find pre-nuptial agreements to be unjust if one party has not had access to separate legal advice, thus it is vital each party seek advice when drafting an agreement.
K v K recognized deficiencies in full disclosure by one party of their assets as another factor courts will think about when determining whether or not to give effect to an agreement's provisions. This appears the right plan of action is to include a schedule to any agreement with a full list of both parties' property. Nevertheless it must be considered that in Radamacher v Granatino [2009] the option that there had not been full disclosure by the wife was not fatal and the pre-nuptial agreement was upheld. When it comes to belongings it is equally critical to note that UK courts will incorporate overseas property in their conviction so it's a great idea to include these in any agreement.
K v K also implies that rushing into an agreement may very well be unfavourably seen as amounting to duress, it is important to permit sufficient time for proper creating and deliberation over an agreement before a union to be able to show an activity of free will by all parties. If this demands postponing the date of the wedding then it could be worth contemplating so you are not confronted with non-enforcement in the matter of a divorce. Because of value of getting a pre-nuptial right, and the reality that all specific cases will have distinct facts and issues to consider, it's always best to seek specialised legal advice when creating a pre-nuptial agreement.
Article Source: Articlelogy.com
- Find an Immigration Lawyer - Find a
Criminal Lawyer - Find a
Divorce lawyer - Find a
Real Estate Lawyer
- Find a Family Lawyer - Find an
Employment lawyer - Find a
Business Lawyer - Find an
Intellectual Property lawyer
- Find a Bankruptcy Lawyer - Find a Personal Injury Lawyer
- Find a Lawyer about anything
- File for an Online Divorce => without the help of a Lawyer <=
- Ask a Solicitor
Word Count: 522
Reduce Your Debts Without Bankruptcy. See How Much You Can Save. Free Debt Analysis
